BRAF Mutation Analysis (V600E), Tumor
As an adjunct to HNPCC / Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) Screen, when colon tumor demonstrates microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and loss of MLH1 protein expression, to help distinguish a somatic versus germline event prior to performing expensive germline testing
As an adjunct to negative MLH1 germline testing in cases where colon tumor demonstrates MSI-H and loss of MLH1 protein expression
Note: Mayo's preferred screening test (MLBRF / MLH1 Hypermethylation and BRAF Mutation Analyses) includes both MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and BRAF V600E testing.
To identify colon tumors with a previously negative KRAS mutation analysis result that may respond to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapies.
To identify melanoma tumors that may respond to anti-BRAF targeted therapies. Note, this is a laboratory developed test and has not been FDA-approved for this purpose.
Clinical Information Discusses physiology, pathophysiology, and general clinical aspects, as they relate to a laboratory test
Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC), also known as Lynch syndrome, is an inherited cancer syndrome caused by a germline mutation in 1 of several genes involved in DNA mismatch repair (MMR), including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. There are several laboratory-based strategies that help establish the diagnosis of HNPCC/Lynch syndrome, including testing tumor tissue for the presence of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and loss of protein expression for any 1 of the MMR proteins by immunohistochemistry (IHC). It is important to note, however, that the MSI-H tumor phenotype is not restricted to inherited cancer cases; approximately 20% of sporadic colon cancers are MSI-H. Thus, MSI-H does not distinguish between a somatic (sporadic) and a germline (inherited) mutation, nor does it identify which gene is involved. Although IHC analysis is helpful in identifying the responsible gene, it also does not distinguish between somatic and germline defects.
Defective MMR in sporadic colon cancer is most often due to an abnormality in MLH1, and the most common cause of gene inactivation is promoter hypermethylation (epigenetic silencing). A specific mutation in the BRAF gene (V600E) has been shown to be present in approximately 70% of tumors with hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter. Importantly, the V600E mutation has not been identified to date in cases with germline MLH1 mutations. Thus, direct assessment of MLH1 promoter methylation status and testing for the BRAF V600E mutation can be used to help distinguish between a germline mutation and epigenetic/somatic inactivation of MLH1. Tumors that have the BRAF V600E mutation and demonstrate MLH1 promoter hypermethylation are almost certainly sporadic, whereas tumors that show neither are most often caused by an inherited mutation.
Although testing for the BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation are best interpreted together, they are also available separately to accommodate various clinical situations and tumor types. These tests can provide helpful diagnostic information when evaluating an individual suspected of having HNPCC/Lynch syndrome, especially when testing is performed in conjunction with HNPCC / Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) Screen, which includes MSI and IHC studies. It should be noted that these tests are not genetic tests, but rather stratify the risk of having an inherited cancer predisposition and identify patients who might benefit from subsequent genetic testing. See Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Testing Algorithm in Special Instructions. Also, see Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colon Cancer (November 2005, Communique') in Publications.
Assessment for the BRAF V600E mutation has alternative clinical utilities. BRAF is part of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling cascade, which plays a role in cell proliferation. Dysregulation of this pathway is a key factor in tumor progression. Targeted therapies directed to components of this pathway have demonstrated some success (increased progression-free and overall survival) in treating patients with certain tumors. Effectiveness of these therapies, however, depends in part on the mutation status of the pathway components.
Reference Values Describes reference intervals and additional information for interpretation of test results. May include intervals based on age and sex when appropriate. Intervals are Mayo-derived, unless otherwise designated. If an interpretive report is provided, the reference value field will state this.
An interpretative report will be provided.
An interpretive report will be provided.
Cautions Discusses conditions that may cause diagnostic confusion, including improper specimen collection and handling, inappropriate test selection, and interfering substances
This test is NOT recommended as a first-tier screening measure for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Please refer to HNPCC / Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) Screen. Testing is best performed in the context of immunohistochemistry results indicating loss of MLH1 protein expression.
Colon cancer is relatively common and it is possible for a sporadic colon cancer to occur in an HNPCC family. Therefore, evaluation of other family members should still be considered in cases with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and absence of the BRAF V600E mutation if there is high clinical suspicion of HNPCC.
Not all patients with wild-type BRAF colon tumors respond to epidermal growth factor receptor -targeted therapies.
Not all melanoma patients with a BRAF mutation will respond to anti-BRAF targeted therapies
Metastatic and corresponding primary lesions may have discordant results
Clinical Reference Provides recommendations for further in-depth reading of a clinical nature
1. Cunningham JM, Kim CY, Christensen ER, et al: The frequency of hereditary defective mismatch repair in a prospective series of unselected colorectal carcinomas. Am J Hum Genet 2001;69:780-790
2. Wang L, Cunningham JM, Winters JL, et al: BRAF mutations in colon cancer are not likely attributable to defective DNA mismatch repair. Cancer Res 2003;63:5209-5212
3. Domingo E, Laiho P, Ollikainen M, et al: BRAF screening as a low-cost effective strategy for simplifying HNPCC genetic testing. J Med Genet 2004;41:664-668
4. Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, et al: Wild-type BRAF is required for response to Panitumumab or Cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5705-5712
5. Flaherty KT, Puzanov I, Kim KB, et al: Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 2010;363(9):809-819