Specimen Transport
Articles & Testing Guides
Education
Outreach Resource Center
- Support Services
- Operations
- Sales and Marketing
- Billing and Finance
- Regulatory
- Examples
- More Resources
- Contact Outreach Team
| Web: | MayoMedicalLaboratories.com |
|---|---|
| Email: | mml@mayo.edu |
| Telephone: | 800.533.1710 |
| International: | 507.266.5700 |
| Values are valid only on day of printing. | |
As a risk factor for disease progression in patients with B-cell CLL
B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common
leukemia in adults. Its clinical course is highly variable with survival
times ranging from months to decades. The standard procedure
for estimating prognosis are clinical staging systems developed by
Rai and Binet. In these staging systems, most CLL patients have early
stage disease. Genetic prognostic markers such as immunoglobulin
heavy chain gene mutational status and fluorescence in situ hybridization
(FISH) studies for specific chromosomal abnormalities have now been
developed to refine the risk of progressive disease. CD38 and ZAP-70
have been identified as surrogate markers for mutational status and can be
evaluated by flow cytometric immunophenotyping.
ZAP-70 (70-kDa zeta-associated protein) is an intracellular tyrosine
kinase discovered initially because of its role in T-cell signaling. It has
also been found to be associated with the B-cell receptor in CLL.
The expression of ZAP-70 (>20% of B-cells) has been associated
with an increased risk for an adverse outcome in B-cell CLL and is
considered an important risk factor in these patients. ZAP-70
expression, if present, is constant throughout the patient's clinical
course and thus is a valid risk marker regardless of when it is
evaluated.
An interpretive report will be provided.
ZAP-70 expression is considered to be a risk factor for disease
progression in patients with B cell CLL. The threshold for ZAP70
staining is established by using normal B cells as the negative
cutoff value and comparing with background positive T cell
staining.
- ZAP-70- negative (<20% of monoclonal B cells) CLL patients
have a median time to treatment of 9.2 years.
- ZAP-70- positive (>20% of monoclonal B cells) CLL patients have
a median time to treatment of 2.9 years.
See "ZAP70 Expression and Overall Survival Among Patients
with B-Cell CLL" in Multimedia for survival curves.
ZAP-70 is an intracellular activation marker in CLL cells and
expression can be labile after 24 hours. Failure to follow specimen
processing, transportation, and storage requirements may lead
to false results..
Bone marrow, lymph node, and tissue specimens will not be
accepted as these specimen types have not been clinically
validated at Mayo or in literature studies. Since B-cell CLL
is, by definition, a peripheral leukemic process and since blood
specimens can be easily obtained, this should not be a significant
limitation.
A ZAP-70 study may be rejected if the histogram pattern indicates
that there has been any cellular changes that could prevent
accurate interpretation of antigen expression.
Prior documented flow cytometric diagnosis of CLL is required
before testing for ZAP-70. Specimens submitted for #3287 "Leukemia/
Lymphoma Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry" will
not be optimal for ZAP-70 testing due to the time delay and
differences in specimen handling requirements. It is suggested
that a second blood specimen be submitted for ZAP-70.
If no immunoglobulin light chain-restricted B cells are identified,
then no ZAP-70 results will be reported.
1. Rassenti LZ, Huynh L, Toy TL, et al: ZAP-70 compared with
immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene mutation status as a
predictor of disease progression in chronic lymphocytic
leukemia. N Engl J Med 2004 August 26;351(9):893-901
2. Crespo M, Bosch F, Villamor N, et al: ZAP-70 expression as
a surrogate for immunoglobulin-variable-region mutations
in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003 May 1;
348(18):1764-1765
3. Orchard JA, Ibbotson RE, Davis Z, et al: ZAP-70 expression
and prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Lancet 2004
January 10;363(9403):105-111