Specimen Transport
Articles & Testing Guides
Education
Outreach Resource Center
- Support Services
- Operations
- Sales and Marketing
- Billing and Finance
- Examples
- More Resources
- Contact Outreach Team
| Web: | MayoMedicalLaboratories.com |
|---|---|
| Email: | mml@mayo.edu |
| Telephone: | 800.533.1710 |
| International: | 507.266.5700 |
| Values are valid only on day of printing. | |
Diagnosing Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections
Neisseria gonorrhoeae, a gram-negative bacterium, is a common
cause of sexually transmitted infection. This organism causes
dysuria and urethral discharge in males with acute urethritis;
complications may include pelvic inflammatory disease in women,
and ascending infection resulting in gonococcal epididymitis and
prostatitis in men.
Neisseria gonorrhoeae is labile and does not remain viable for
sustained periods of time. Diagnosis by culture methods, rather
than NAT testing, especially after extended transit times, is not
recommended. Previously, culture was considered the gold
standard test for diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.
However, the organisms are labile in vitro, and precise specimen
collection, transportation, and processing conditions are required
to maintain organism viability, a necessity for culturing. Nucleic
acid amplification testing (NAAT), which detects DNA of the organism,
does not require the organism to be alive, is much more sensitive than
culture, and is now considered the preferred test for detecting
Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
Improved screening rates and increased sensitivity of NAAT testing
translate to increased numbers of accurately diagnosed cases.
Improved detection rates resulting from both increased assay
performance and patients' easy acceptance of urine testing,
combined with appropriate treatment, decrease disease burden
and spread.(3-5) Early identification of infection enables sexual
partners to seek testing and/or treatment as soon as possible
and reduces the risk of disease spread. Prompt treatment reduces
the risk of infertility in women.
Negative
A positive result indicates the presence of rRNA of Neisseria
gonorrhoeae.
A negative result indicates that rRNA for Neisseria gonorrhoeae
was not detected in the specimen.
The predictive value of an assay depends on the prevalence of
the disease in any particular population. In settings with a high
prevalence of sexually transmitted disease, positive assay results
have a high likelihood of being true positives. In settings with a low
prevalence of sexually transmitted disease, or in any settings in
which a patient's clinical signs and symptoms or risk factors are
inconsistent with gonococcal or chlamydial urogenital infection,
positive results should be carefully assessed and the patient
retested by other methods (eg, culture for Neisseria gonorrhoeae),
if appropriate.
This report is intended for use in clinical monitoring or management
of patients; it is not intended for use in medico-legal applications.
Appropriate specimen collection and handling is necessary for
optimal assay performance.
Results should be interpreted in conjunction with other laboratory
and clinical information.
A negative test result does not exclude the possibility of infection.
Improper specimen collection, concurrent antibiotic therapy,
presence of inhibitors, or low numbers of organisms in the
specimen (ie, below the sensitivity of the test) may cause
false-negative test results.
In low prevalence populations, positive results must be interpreted
carefully as false-positive results may occur more frequently than
true positive results in this setting.
This assay cannot be used to assess therapeutic success or failure,
since nucleic acids from the organism may persist following
antimicrobial therapy.
The presence of mucous does not interfere with this assay. However,
this test requires endocervical cells, and if excess mucous is not
removed prior to collection, adequate numbers of these cells may
not be obtained.
No interference is expected due to:
- Blood (urine and swabs) specimens
- Lubricants and spermicides (swabs)
The effects of use of tampons, douching, specimen types other than
those listed in "Specimen Required,†and specimen collection variables
have not been determined.
Testing of urine specimens with this method is not intended to replace
cervical exam and endocervical sampling for diagnosis of urogenital
infection; infections may result from other causes or concurrent infections
may occur.
Testing urine specimens as the sole test for identifying female patients
with gonococcal infections may miss some infected individuals.
Performance estimates for urine specimens are based on evaluation of
urine obtained from the first part of the urine stream; performance on
midstream collections has not been determined.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2002. Reporting
of laboratory-confirmed chlamydial infection and gonorrhea
by providers affiliated with three large Managed Care
Organizations - United States,1995-1999. MMWR Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep 2002;51:256-259
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Screening Tests
To Detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Infections-2002. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Recommendations and Reports October 18, 2002;Vol. 51;
No RR-15
3. Crotchfelt KA, Pare B, Gaydos C, Quinn TC: Detection of Chlamydia
trachomatis by the GEN-PROBE AMPLIFIED Chlamydia trachomatis
Assay (AMP CT) in urine specimens from men and women and
endocervical specimens from women. J Clin Microbiol. 1998
Feb;36(2):391-394
4. Gaydos CA, Quinn TC, Willis D, et al: Performance of the APTIMA
Combo 2 assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and
Neisseria gonorrhoeae in female urine and endocervical swab
specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jan;41(1):304-309
5. Chernesky MA, Jang DE: APTIMA transcription-mediated
amplification assays for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria
gonorrhoeae. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2006 Jul;6(4):519-525