Interpretive Handbook

Test 62188 :
LDL and HDL Particle Concentration NMR, Plasma

Clinical Information Discusses physiology, pathophysiology, and general clinical aspects, as they relate to a laboratory test

The key role of apolipoprotein-B (apo B) particles in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease is well recognized. A majority (90%-95%) of these apoB particles are low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles. While low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remains the primary focus for cardiovascular risk assessment and evaluation of pharmacologic effectiveness based on treatment target goals, evidence indicates that a narrow focus on LDL-C assessment and treatment alone is not the optimal strategy for patient care. What remains controversial is whether we are using the best measure of LDL to identify all individuals at risk and further stratify those who would benefit from additional or more aggressive therapeutic interventions.


There are several known limitations that make LDL-C a less accurate marker of cardiovascular risk than either non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein particle number (LDL-P), or apolipoprotein-B. Furthermore, there is sufficient evidence that other triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) are atherogenic including very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) remnants and intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDL). There continue to be numerous patients who succeed in meeting their target "LDL-C goal" but still develop complications from atherosclerotic vascular disease and suffer from cardiovascular events. These patients bear the burden of having residual risk not identified with traditional metabolic and cardiovascular markers.


Several studies have shown that quantitative measures of LDL particle concentrations, assessed by either nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or apolipoprotein B, are associated with cardiovascular disease to a much greater extent than either LDL size or LDL-C. This is due to the 1 to 1 relationship of apoB to non-HDL particles, meaning there is 1 apoB per LDL, IDL, lipoprotein(a), VLDL, and chylomicron particles. The numbers of atherogenic LDL particles are frequently elevated even though LDL cholesterol is not, particularly in patients with pre-diabetes, diabetes, and/or insulin sensitivity. In the Veterans Affairs High Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial (VA-HIT), which included a relatively large proportion of subjects with diabetes (30.4%) and insulin resistance (30%), both traditional risk factors and NMR analyses were assessed in patients treated with the lipid-modifying agent gemfibrozil or placebo. LDL cholesterol was not influenced by treatment with gemfibrozil, but HDL cholesterol increased by 6% and was associated with a 22% reduction in events. While LDL cholesterol remained unchanged, the total LDL particle concentration decreased by 5%, small LDL particle concentration decreased by 20%, total HDL particle concentration increased by 10%, and large HDL particles increased by 21%. Interestingly, neither baseline nor on-trial concentrations of HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, or triglycerides were significant predictors of coronary heart disease (CHD) events. Among NMR lipoproteins measured, both baseline and on-trial concentrations of total LDL and HDL particle concentrations were independent predictors of new CHD events with on-trial p-values of 0.0003 and <0.0001, respectively. Neither LDL nor HDL particle size was related to CHD events.


This test reports values for total and small LDL particle concentrations and total and large HDL concentrations.

Useful For Suggests clinical disorders or settings where the test may be helpful

Assessment and management of a patient's risk for cardiovascular disease and events

Interpretation Provides information to assist in interpretation of the test results

Elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle concentration is associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease, and may be reflective of residual risk in patients at target LDL cholesterol concentration.


Decreased total and large high-density lipoprotein particles have been associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease.

Cautions Discusses conditions that may cause diagnostic confusion, including improper specimen collection and handling, inappropriate test selection, and interfering substances

No significant cautionary statements

Reference Values Describes reference intervals and additional information for interpretation of test results. May include intervals based on age and sex when appropriate. Intervals are Mayo-derived, unless otherwise designated. If an interpretive report is provided, the reference value field will state this.


< or =15 years: not established

Adults (> or =16 years):

<1,000 nmol/L (optimal)

1,000-1,299 nmol/L (near or above optimal)

1,300-1,599 nmol/L (borderline high)

1,600-2,000 nmol/L (high)

>2,000 nmol/L (very high)



< or =15 years: not established

Adults (> or =16 years):

<117 nmol/L (optimal)

117-526 nmol/L (intermediate)

527-839 nmol/L (borderline high)

>839 nmol/L (high)



< or =15 years: not established

Adults (> or =16 years):

<26.7 mcmol/L (low)

26.7-34.9 mcmol/L (intermediate)

>34.9 mcmol/L (optimal)



< or =15 years: not established

Adults (> or =16 years):

<3.1 mcmol/L (low)

3.1-7.3 mcmol/L (intermediate)

>7.3 mcmol/L (optimal)


Small LDL, Total HDL and Large HDL Particle Concentrations were validated by LipoScience and the CVLM laboratory at the Mayo Clinic. NMR spectra are generated at Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., Rochester, MN 55905 and results calculated  by Liposcience, Inc., 2500 Sumner Boulevard, Raleigh NC 27616.


Interpretation of LDL lipoprotein concentration should be conducted within the context of standard lipid profile results (total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, calculated LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol).

Clinical References Provides recommendations for further in-depth reading of a clinical nature

1. Blake GJ, Otvos JD, Rifai N, Ridker PM: Low-density lipoprotein particle concentration and size as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as predictors of cardiovascular disease in women. Circulation 2002;106(15):1930-1937

2. Rosenson RS, Otvos JD, Freedman DS: Relations of lipoprotein subclass levels and low-density lipoprotein size to progression of coronary artery disease in the Pravastatin Limitation of Atherosclerosis in the Coronary Arteries (PLAC-I) trial. Am J Cardiol 2002;90(2):89-94

3. Kuller L, Arnold A, Tracy R, et al: Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of lipoproteins and risk of coronary heart disease in the cardiovascular health study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002;22(7):1175-1180

4. Cole TG, Contois JH, Csako G, et al: Association of apolipoprotein B and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy-derived LDL particle number with outcomes in 25 clinical studies: assessment by the AACC Lipoprotein and Vascular Diseases Division Working Group on Best Practices. Clin Chem 2013;59(5):752-770

5. Otvos JD, Collins D, Freedman DS, et al: Low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein particle subclasses predict coronary events and are favorably changed by gemfibrozil therapy in the Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial. Circulation 2006;113(12):1556-1563