Von Willebrand Disease (VWD)
Part 3: VWF Activity Assay

VWF:Lx and VWF:RCo Method Comparison

June 2011

We included a total of 492 samples for this validation study. 168 samples were from Mayo Clinic patients and the rest were consultation samples from Mayo Medical Laboratories. We compared VWF latex activity method with the reference VWF ristocetin cofactor activity assay by light transmission platelet aggregation. VWF latex activity assay has very good linear correlation with VWF ristocetin cofactor activity assay with R square at 0.93.

< Previous Slide

VWF:Lx and VWF:RCo Method Comparison

Next Slide >

 

Jump to section:

• Introduction
• Objectives
• History of VWF Ristocetin Cofactor Activity (VWF:RCo) Assay
• Problems with VWF:RCo Assay
• Summary of External Quality Assessment of VWF:RCo
• von Willebrand Disease(VWD) Diagnostic Error Rates Due to Erroneous VWF:RCo Results⁵
• VWF:RCo/Ag Ratio is Insensitive for Aquired von Willebrand Abnormalities (AVWA)
• VWF:RCo is Inadequate for Detecting AVW Abnormality
• The New Automated VWF Activity by Latex-Immunoturbidity Assay (VWF:Lx)
• VWF Activity Assay by an A1 Domain Conformation-Sensitive Antibody⁶
• Performance Characteristics of VWF:Lx
• VWF:Lx and VWF:RCo Method Comparison
• VWF:Lx and VWF:RCo Bias Analysis
• Sample Categorization
• Comparison of VWF:Lx/Ag and VWF:RCo/Ag Ratios
• VWF:Lx and VWF:RCo Errors
• Severe Type 1 vs 2M⁷
• VWF:Lx and RCo Errors
• VWF:Lx/Ag is Sensitive to AVWA with Subtle Loss of Highest HMWM
• ROC Analysis of VWF:Lx/Ag and VWF:RCo/Ag for Detecting AVWA with Loss of HMWMs
• VWF:Lx/Ag vs VWF:RCo/Ag Ratios
• VWF Laboratory Testing Strategy
• Sensitivity and Specificity of the Screening Panel
• von Willebrand Disease Profile
• von Willebrand Disease Profile
• von Willebrand Disease Profile
• von Willebrand Disease Profile
• Limitations of VWF:Lx
• Summary
• References
• Questions?